Stick to the knitting (Peters and Waterman)
How can stick to the knitting (peters and waterman) support strategic choice or positioning?
Contents
A strategic principle that favours building from capabilities the organisation understands over diversifying into unfamiliar businesses.
Among the principles associated with In Search of Excellence, “stick to the knitting” became the most memorable: concentrate on businesses whose customers, economics and capabilities the organisation genuinely understands.
When to use it
- Keep the maxim in view whenever strategy proposes entry into unfamiliar products, markets or operating models.
Origins
Industrialist Andrew Carnegie argued in the nineteenth century that pre-eminence comes from mastering one line rather than scattering resources across many concerns. Tom Peters and Robert Waterman brought a similar idea into modern management through In Search of Excellence, published in 1982 after a McKinsey research project on the organisational practices of high-performing companies.
What it is
Carnegie’s argument was direct: the road to exceptional performance is mastery, and people rarely become pre-eminent in money-making while dividing attention among many unrelated concerns. His own concentration on steel made the point tangible.
Peters and Waterman’s 1982 book became an immediate business bestseller and a subject of intense debate. Its reputation later weakened when several supposedly excellent case companies—including Delta Airlines, Digital Equipment, Eastman Kodak and K Mart—experienced serious decline. Yet parts of the framework endured. The authors, then McKinsey consultants, had interviewed senior executives around the world about organisational structure and people. Their work produced eight principles:
A bias for action – decide, experiment and use autonomous task forces rather than allowing analysis to stop movement.
Close to the customer – learn directly from the people the organisation serves and make customer satisfaction central.
Autonomy and entrepreneurship – encourage innovation, responsible risk and internal champions.
Productivity through people – treat employees with respect and sustain motivation.
Hands-on, value-driven – make values operational and require leaders to model them.
Stick to the knitting – focus on activities the company knows and performs well.
Simple form, lean staff – keep structures and systems intelligible, minimise headquarters overhead and place authority near business units.
Simultaneous loose–tight properties – combine operational autonomy with a small number of strong central values and controls, while remaining willing to change.
Eight principles of corporate excellence

Loose-tight control
Simple & lean
Bias for action
Close to customer
Stick to knitting
Value-driven
Excellence
Entrepreneurship
Productivity
The principle was not new, as Carnegie’s view shows, and later core-strategy work such as Zook’s Profit from the core (Zook) developed related ideas. Its importance lay partly in challenging the era’s enthusiasm for diversified conglomerates managed primarily through financial controls. Some performed well temporarily but struggled to sustain advantage across unrelated businesses.
The principle also fits Igor Ansoff’s The product/market matrix (Ansoff): moving into both a new product and a new market is the highest-risk route. AOL’s merger with Time Warner illustrates a company that might later have preferred greater focus. Intel, LVMH, BMW and IKEA provide contrasting examples of organisations that built depth around a recognisable domain, even while evolving within it.
How to use it
When strategy proposes a new product for a new market—through acquisition or organic development—challenge the rationale before committing:
Which resources or capabilities genuinely transfer to the new activity?
What does the The suns & clouds chart reveal about the balance between opportunity and risk?
Could strengthening or extending the core generate a better return with less risk?
“Stick to the knitting” is not an instruction never to diversify. It is a demand for evidence that the organisation has a right to win and can build the missing capabilities without weakening the core.
Top practical tip
Name the specific customer insight, capability, channel or asset that transfers from the core. If the case relies only on capital and optimism, reconsider it.
Top pitfall
Do not confuse focus with inertia. A declining core can make familiar work feel safe even when the organisation needs a deliberate capability-building move into an adjacent domain.
Further reading
- Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (nineteen eighty-two). In Search of Excellence. Harper & Row.
- Peters, T.J. and Austin, N. (nineteen eighty-five). A Passion for Excellence. Random House.